By Faress Jouejati
Despite
the impressive numbers of Bashar al-Assad’s security apparatus, the Syrian army
is not all that powerful. Furthermore, Syrian security forces are now tired and
demoralized. Thus, an important show of outside force would cause major cracks
in the Syrian army. Let us not forget that there already is foreign
intervention in Syria: Russia, Iran, and Hizbullah have all equipped the Syrian
army with highly lethal material. The latter two have sent troops to support
the regime’s barbaric crackdown on peaceful protesters.
Yes,
the weapons al-Assad has are superior to what we can send the Free Syria Army,
but, forget not, he is using this military superiority against civilians. It
would be outrageous for us to simply sit and watch -- and debate whether we should
save civilian lives or not intervene. More than 8,000 have already been
murdered: a catastrophe is looming and the civilian casualties will be massive
if all we do is flock from one meeting to the next hoping that diplomacy and
more sanctions will put an end to state-sponsored terrorism.
Arming
the FSA is the best bet to protect the civilians. The arms sent to the FSA
would not necessarily be used in acts of vengeance: Syria does not have the
kind of sectarian strife that Lebanon, for example, has. Plus, the type of Islam
prevalent in Syria is not an extremist Salafist type, to say nothing of the
fact that the FSA has rejected the assistance of al-Qaeda. In any case, it is
the convoluted Friends of Assad who are bent on inciting sectarianism among the
protesters who, to this day, chant, “al shaab al surie wahed (the Syrian people
are one).”
To Syrians still on the fence, I say
this: the free people of Syria are not rising to please the East or West. They are
not paying blood to replace one set of tyrants with another. Remaining silent,
however, makes the Revolution more vulnerable to groups with separate agendas
from the demands of the Syrian people—freedom, democracy, equality, and
justice.
A
safe-zone should be established inside Syrian territory, funded by the Gulf and
controlled by Turkey. This will give Syrians access to humanitarian relief and
provide the FSA with a base out of which to operate. In addition to military
equipment, what the FSA needs urgently is communications equipment: stronger command-and-control would give them an edge since they already have the
advantage in mobility. The high motivation of the FSA's foot soldiers makes up
for the deficit in numbers.
Given
the above, it makes sense to support the Syrian people and equip the Free Syria
Army. The Syrian people have the right to access medical supplies and weapons
to save and protect their families. We must make the presently lopsided balance
of power a more equal playing field.
No comments:
Post a Comment